HP p7-1400z

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP p7-1400z  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 22 '24 at 05:41
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5500 APU-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
44.5% Average
Memory 70.8
1-Core 43.5
2-Core 78.7
42% 64.3 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 120
15% 113 Pts
64-Core 120
8% 120 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7560D
HP(103C 2AE0) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1060.0
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
2.58% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 4.4
2% 3.8 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5.1
3% 3.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.58%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256GB
216GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP3215A2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 266 289 303 298 304 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 286
Write 282
Mixed 247
SusWrite 282
62% 274 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 28.5
4K Mixed 5.3
41% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 16.4
42% 89.4 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1333 C9 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 10427 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.7% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 5
14% 4.93 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.13 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 30 7 60 23.5" 1280 720 ACI249A ASUS VS247
Typical p7-1400z Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: HP p7-1400z

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $290
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback