Asrock H310CM-HDV

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	43.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock H310CM-HDV (all builds)
Memory	3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190514
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '24 at 22:36
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	79.6% Very good	Memory 91.5 1-Core 124 2-Core 247 87% 154 Pts	4-Core 386 8-Core 424 53% 405 Pts	64-Core 409 25% 409 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% MSI(1462 8D92) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.65 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.4% Average	Lighting 56.4 Reflection 57.4 Parallax 54.7 46% 56.2 fps	MRender 42.3 Gravity 51.7 Splatting 46.4 38% 46.8 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 240GB 10,970 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 146GB free (System drive) Firmware: AP613PE0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 144 61 64 66 50 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	56.4% Above average	Read 434 Write 272 Mixed 81.4 SusWrite 96.2 49% 221 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 34.6 4K Mixed 23.4 82% 26.6 MB/s	DQ Read 234 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 176 131% 178 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 95%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 913GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 150 168 164 169 169 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 200 Write 157 Mixed 90.3 SusWrite 162 112% 152 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.2 236% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NMUD480E84-2666E 1x8GB 190 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.3% Average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 11.4 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 11.8 SC Mixed 11.9 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 44: 0P 3R 5G 14B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
44%	24%	91	214	59	60	23.8"	1280 720	BNQ7FCC BenQ EX240N

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310CM-HDV Builds (Compare 3,864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-HDV

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,315x
Core i3-9100FIntel $115Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	1,159x
Core i5-8400Intel $114Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	136x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	574x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	310x
RTX 2060Nvidia $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	267x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	182x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $57Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	135x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	127x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	93x
PSD48G266681 2x8GBPatriotBench 79%, 6,425 samples	82x
CM4X8GD3200C16K2E 2x8GBCorsairBench 84%, 6,228 samples	72x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $268

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16