Asus PRIME H310M-K R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	52.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H310M-K R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210709
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '24 at 15:27
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	IRN-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$145 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	90.3% Outstanding	Memory 84.6 1-Core 135 2-Core 268 89% 163 Pts	4-Core 525 8-Core 696 78% 610 Pts	64-Core 732 45% 732 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% XFX(1682 C580) CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.8% Above average	Lighting 66.6 Reflection 64.7 Parallax 90 54% 73.8 fps	MRender 65.5 Gravity 75.8 Splatting 47.5 50% 62.9 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 56%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Dahua C800A SSD 128GB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: DHS20183 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 430 Write 396 Mixed 349 87% 391 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 72.5 4K Mixed 35.3 125% 45.1 MB/s	DQ Read 142 DQ Write 299 DQ Mixed 188 152% 210 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 89%
SSD 128GB 128GB 200 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 113GB free Firmware: S0424A0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 381 Write 332 Mixed 36.1 55% 250 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 29.8 4K Mixed 1.1 55% 18.6 MB/s	DQ Read 78.1 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 1 36% 83.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 84%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050V 500GB 5,167 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 281GB free Firmware: AX0C1Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 103 Write 107 Mixed 42.6 62% 84.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
GEIL CL17-17-17 D4-2400 1x16GB 425 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	45.7% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 16.3 MC Mixed 13.8 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 15.6 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 72 56% 72 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	59	60	18.4"	1280 720	GSM4BAD W1943

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H310M-K R2.0 Builds (Compare 7,103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-K R2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	3,209x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	1,504x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	460x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	726x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	564x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	515x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	436x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $33Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	309x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	298x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	206x
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	162x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	138x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $353

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16