HP Laptop 15-db0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
SystemHP Laptop 15-db0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84AE
Memory6.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '24 at 12:56
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Memory 34
1-Core 67.6
2-Core 128
41% 76.5 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 357
36% 290 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
HP(103C 84AE) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 30.0.13023.4001
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
5.27% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 7
Parallax 10.6
4% 7.57 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 8.5
Splatting 9.6
7% 9 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 5.27%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W-128G-1006 128GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6103006
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 409
Write 141
Mixed 253
59% 268 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 52.7
4K Mixed 32.3
108% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 173
137% 192 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 90%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: RSM7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 130
Write 126
Mixed 63.8
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
212% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD M471A5244CB0-CTD 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
48.7% Average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 22.3
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 10.8
23% 8.2 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 58 42 60 15.5" 1536 793 BOE0687
Typical Laptop 15-db0xxx Builds (Compare 1,041 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-db0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback