Packard imedia S2870

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 14% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.99%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Packard imedia S2870 (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard imedia S2870
Memory	0.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120518
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 20 '24 at 21:46
Run Duration	193 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G540-$70 1,658 User benchmarks, average bench 47% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	8.99% Terrible	Memory 8.7 1-Core 50.9 2-Core 78.6 23% 46.1 Pts	4-Core 52.6 8-Core 58.3 7% 55.4 Pts	64-Core 43.6 3% 43.6 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 8.99% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0492) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.54% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 0.8 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.6 fps	MRender 1.3 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 1 1% 0.97 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.54% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32 107,978 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 418GB free (System drive) Firmware: JC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 19 31 29 33 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 13.5 Write 38 Mixed 18.8 SusWrite 28.4 18% 24.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 57% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR512X64D3U13C9G 1x4GB 511 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	9.82% Terrible	MC Read 1.9 MC Write 2.9 MC Mixed 3.5 8% 2.77 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 0.4 5% 1.8 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.82% Great: 30%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 11: 0P 2R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
11%	4%	70	22	16	60	72.3"	1360 768	GSM0001 LG TV

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical imedia S2870 Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Packard imedia S2870

CPU
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	19x
Pentium G2020Intel $92Bench 49%, 15,664 samples	9x
Core i5-3340Intel $278Bench 66%, 8,792 samples	9x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	32x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	19x
GeForce GT 620NvidiaBench 2%, 17,163 samples	17x

SSD
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $190Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
INTENSO 256GBBench 72%, 4,055 samples	2x

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 29%, 7,230 samples	8x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	7x
ACR16D3LU1KBG/4G 2x4GBKingstonBench 47%, 1,001 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $269

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16