Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics76.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '24 at 21:13
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 88.6
1-Core 124
2-Core 224
83% 146 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 595
62% 498 Pts
64-Core 624
39% 624 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.8% Very good
Lighting 98
Reflection 96
Parallax 88.6
80% 94.2 fps
MRender 97.5
Gravity 90.4
Splatting 76.3
71% 88.1 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 683 635 309 307 308 309 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1,372
Write 1,207
Mixed 984
SusWrite 425
223% 997 MB/s
4K Read 51.5
4K Write 96.3
4K Mixed 62.4
209% 70.1 MB/s
DQ Read 938
DQ Write 615
DQ Mixed 806
593% 787 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 180%
Great: 280%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
466GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 443 451 467 471 345 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 463
Mixed 454
SusWrite 410
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 85.2
4K Mixed 48
160% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 359
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 110%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
466GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 443 451 466 471 328 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 461
Mixed 417
SusWrite 407
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 85.6
4K Mixed 39.3
141% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 361
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 104%
Great: 129%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
798GB free, PID 0800
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 41 40 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 39.7
Write 40.2
Mixed 27.1
SusWrite 40.3
50% 36.8 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.6
188% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB-$110
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
72.2% Very good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 22.8
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 21.1
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 30 72.3" 1280 720 UMC0000 UMC-BLAUPUNKT
Typical MAXIMUS IX FORMULA Builds (Compare 1,532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA - $378

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,187
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback