Asus ROG STRIX Z370-I GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-I GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '24 at 20:11
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$125
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 94.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 244
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 583
66% 514 Pts
64-Core 643
40% 643 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2640 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 546.65
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
107% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 159
Parallax 154
113% 150 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 151
Splatting 108
101% 125 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 107%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BX400G4 300GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: G2010140
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 332 339 354 344 364 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 318
Write 295
Mixed 217
SusWrite 343
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 67.9
4K Mixed 29
108% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 329
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 273
213% 293 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 96%
Samsung MZ7LM960HCHP-00003 960GB
459GB free
Firmware: GXT3003Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 395 404 428 429 429 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Read 429
Write 414
Mixed 310
SusWrite 410
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 79.1
4K Mixed 34.9
124% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 323
252% 348 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$45
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 32.7
102% 35.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 36.1
SC Mixed 27.7
80% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 57.6
70% 57.6 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 27" 1280 720 ACR06E2 VG271
Typical ROG STRIX Z370-I GAMING Builds (Compare 1,466 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-I GAMING - $159

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $964
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback