Lenovo 81DE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81DE  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210519
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJan 20 '24 at 14:49
Run Duration455 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 3867U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Memory 31.1
1-Core 35.4
2-Core 33.4
22% 33.3 Pts
4-Core 36.2
8-Core 38.2
5% 37.2 Pts
64-Core 33.5
2% 33.5 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 610
Legend(17AA 3965) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
1.22% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 3.1
0% 2.27 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.77 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.22%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 178
Write 168
Mixed 147
37% 164 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 6.3
20% 6.3 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
292GB free
Firmware: AM0Q6E
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 69.1
Write 41.4
Mixed 31.9
35% 47.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD M471A1K43CB1-CRC 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.15% Terrible
MC Read 0
MC Write 0.2
MC Mixed 0.2
0% 0.13 GB/s
SC Read 0.1
SC Write 0.4
SC Mixed 0.1
1% 0.2 GB/s
Latency 398
10% 398 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 1.15%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 14 60 15.5" 1366 768 CMN15DB
Typical 81DE Builds (Compare 2,960 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81DE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback