Intel H110

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
MotherboardIntel H110  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220302
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '24 at 14:19
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 71.2
1-Core 85.2
2-Core 170
62% 109 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 287
37% 278 Pts
64-Core 287
18% 287 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
5.51% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 7.2
5% 6.03 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 10
6% 7.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.51%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
EVM SSD 128GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC2S038C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,448
Write 1,293
Mixed 951
274% 1,231 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 71.5
4K Mixed 46.6
157% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 590
DQ Write 404
DQ Mixed 443
345% 479 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 144%
BFDT50S 500GB
463GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 119 116 118 120 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 124
Write 111
Mixed 72.9
SusWrite 119
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CB8GU2666.C8RT 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.1% Poor
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 8.6
28% 9.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 9.2
24% 8.57 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 21.5" 1280 720 DYN2150 FINGERS 2150
Typical H110 Builds (Compare 468 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback