HP ProBook 450 15.6 inch G9 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP ProBook 450 15.6 inch G9 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8AA1
Memory6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231019
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateJan 20 '24 at 14:07
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1255U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 62.4
1-Core 126
2-Core 211
73% 133 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 440
52% 401 Pts
64-Core 558
34% 558 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 8AA1) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4887
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Lighting 17.8
Reflection 18.5
Parallax 17.6
14% 18 fps
MRender 17.5
Gravity 23
Splatting 15.6
15% 18.7 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4512HBLU-00BH1 512GB
367GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3NHAV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 598 531 646 437 526 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 839
Write 587
Mixed 573
SusWrite 538
142% 634 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 26.9
4K Mixed 26.7
86% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 470
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 355
255% 337 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 108%
Great: 303%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4S2S8MF-16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
50.2% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 17.3
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 11: 0P 1R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
11% 12% 40 197 58 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO3DA3
Typical ProBook 450 15.6 inch G9 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 450 15.6 inch G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback