Today's hottest deals

Asus X555LB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics9.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemAsus X555LB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X555LB
Memory1.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '24 at 11:33
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
38.6% Below average
Memory 57.2
1-Core 49.4
2-Core 91.5
41% 66 Pts
4-Core 117
8-Core 122
16% 119 Pts
64-Core 138
9% 138 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 940M
Asus(1043 1A6D) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8857
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
9.37% Terrible
Lighting 12.7
Reflection 9.7
Parallax 11
10% 11.1 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 13.2
Splatting 8.8
7% 9.03 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.37%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 480GB
301GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P190710b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 125 208 277 315 314 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Write 166
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 225
36% 153 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 17.8
4K Mixed 6.3
28% 10.3 MB/s
DQ Read 45
DQ Write 79.3
DQ Mixed 64.5
48% 62.9 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT41K512M8RH-125:E Hynix HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.2% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 10.3
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 8.5
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 140
28% 140 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 17: 0P 1R 3G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
17% 16% 43 98 4 60 15.6" 1280 720 LGD045D
Typical X555LB Builds (Compare 692 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X555LB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback