Monster ABRA A7 V12.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics40.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive154% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMonster ABRA A7 V12.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A7 V12.1
Memory13.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200512
Uptime7.8 Days
Run DateJan 20 '24 at 01:10
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 167
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 327
36% 282 Pts
64-Core 318
20% 318 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Clevo(1558 8536) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5720
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.1% Average
Lighting 49.6
Reflection 52.3
Parallax 46.3
40% 49.4 fps
MRender 61.4
Gravity 44.4
Splatting 42
39% 49.3 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$95
302GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 877 424 309 306 325 304 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 1,384
Write 1,460
Mixed 1,155
SusWrite 424
248% 1,106 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 86.1
4K Mixed 50.2
167% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 574
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 485
355% 469 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 154%
Great: 237%
Samsung MZVL4512HBLU-00B07 512GB
15GB free
Firmware: HXC7002Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,912
Write 1,469
Mixed 1,428
356% 1,603 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 62.1
204% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 595
DQ Write 368
DQ Mixed 504
370% 489 MB/s
Poor: 144% Great: 351%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 Samsung M471A2K43EB1-CWE 24GB
2933, 2933 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
52.6% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 15.8
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 17.9
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 17.3" 1280 720 AUO978F
Typical ABRA A7 V12.1 Builds (Compare 331 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A7 V12.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback