Micro Mercury series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro Mercury series  (all builds)
MotherboardShenzhen F7BRC
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230625
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 19 '24 at 18:06
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U Graphics
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 57.8
1-Core 100
2-Core 229
68% 129 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 838
77% 643 Pts
64-Core 1,055
65% 1,055 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD(1002 1681) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.8.2
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 21.3
Reflection 28.6
Parallax 39.2
17% 29.7 fps
MRender 26.2
Gravity 21.7
Splatting 13.3
16% 20.4 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0 1TB
879GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFKBO.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,673
Write 3,454
Mixed 1,979
536% 2,369 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 57.7
200% 71.7 MB/s
DQ Read 898
DQ Write 634
DQ Mixed 778
578% 770 MB/s
Poor: 157% Great: 368%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 1TB
266GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 36
Write 29.9
Mixed 21.4
35% 29.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
47% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung H58G66AK6BX070N 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84.2% Excellent
MC Read 35.7
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 38.8
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 23.3
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 75 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5B55 LG FULL HD
Typical Mercury series Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Micro Mercury series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback