Mcj_unitcom/i7hpr64 H81M-D3V-JP

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	75.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	73.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Mcj_unitcom/i7hpr64 H81M-D3V-JP (all builds)
Motherboard	MouseComputer H81M-D3V-JP
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140318
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 19 '24 at 10:57
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	20%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	60.4% Good	Memory 85.1 1-Core 91.9 2-Core 135 64% 104 Pts	4-Core 196 8-Core 272 30% 234 Pts	64-Core 284 18% 284 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33 Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	75.5% Very good	Lighting 92.7 Reflection 102 Parallax 92.3 76% 95.6 fps	MRender 90 Gravity 94.4 Splatting 91.4 75% 91.9 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNF128GCSS 128GB 2,061 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: FSLAN102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 264 348 185 287 218 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	73.1% Very good	Read 416 Write 369 Mixed 384 SusWrite 243 79% 353 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 37.2 4K Mixed 28 88% 28.8 MB/s	DQ Read 361 DQ Write 275 DQ Mixed 305 232% 314 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 90%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 378GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 174 177 177 176 169 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	97.1% Outstanding	Read 168 Write 169 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 170 98% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 126% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 97.1% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 2x8GB 6,864 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	54.2% Above average	MC Read 20 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 16.2 54% 18.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 16.3 SC Mixed 17.4 47% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 71.7 56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 10: 0P 2R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
10%	11%	19	217	60	60	19.1"	1280 720	IOD1390 LCD-AD191X2

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-D3V-JP Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 27%

Raft

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

System: Mcj_unitcom/i7hpr64 H81M-D3V-JP

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	3x
Core i5-4570SIntelBench 66%, 11,172 samples	1x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	1x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	1x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	1x

SSD
PX-256M8VC + 256GBPlextorBench 97%, 20 samples	2x
THNSNF128GCSS 128GBToshibaBench 68%, 2,061 samples	1x
MX500 500GBCrucial $47Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	1x

RAM
ACR16D3LU1KFG/4G 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 2,425 samples	2x
AM2L16BC4R1-B08S 2x4GBAdataBench 56%, 11 samples	1x
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 2x8GBUnknownBench 52%, 6,864 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $273

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16