HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics26.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8653
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231026
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 19 '24 at 05:06
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400-$160
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 91.8
1-Core 120
2-Core 239
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 593
68% 531 Pts
64-Core 551
34% 551 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
HP(103C 8465) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.70
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.9% Poor
Lighting 33.5
Reflection 38.1
Parallax 35.8
27% 35.8 fps
MRender 36.2
Gravity 36.7
Splatting 25.6
26% 32.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g KIOXIA 256GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADHA0102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 463 430 401 503 488 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 824
Write 519
Mixed 614
SusWrite 460
135% 604 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 62.3
4K Mixed 43
140% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 653
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 390
307% 436 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 125%
Great: 152%
Seagate ST4000NM0033-9ZM170 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: SN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 176 179 179 180 179 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 164
Mixed 90.2
SusWrite 177
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
225% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-3G2J1 16GB
2400, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.9% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 22.8
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 23.7
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 12 60 23.8" 1280 720 LEN65D2 L24q-20
Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx Builds (Compare 3,099 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $440
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback