HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC-GT13-0185no

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is relative performance (0th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 100 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Desktop PC-GT13-0185no  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8703
Memory54.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221013
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJan 18 '24 at 19:41
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Relative performance (0th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900K-$430
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
43.6% Average
Memory 55.2
1-Core 69.3
2-Core 95.6
45% 73.4 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 181
25% 184 Pts
64-Core 291
18% 291 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
HP(103C 88D5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 546.65
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
115% Outstanding
Lighting 86.8
Reflection 137
Parallax 296
71% 173 fps
MRender 355
Gravity 260
Splatting 189
210% 268 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 115%
Great: 230%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC WD BLACK SDB 1TB
273GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1219 1341 1423 922 795 902 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 1,050
Write 1,705
Mixed 1,194
SusWrite 1,100
286% 1,262 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 70.8
4K Mixed 43.5
140% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 520
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 225
203% 317 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 169%
Great: 298%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4U8D8HC-16XR 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
40.2% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 12.7
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 16.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 6: 0P 1R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
6% 33% 6 160 11 60 34.1" 3440 1369 ACR0450 Acer X34A
Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC-GT13-0185no Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 205%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 220%
UFO

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC-GT13-0185no

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $1,628
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback