Asus P8H67-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive50.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '24 at 16:55
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 89.3
1-Core 93.5
2-Core 183
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 307
40% 300 Pts
64-Core 313
19% 313 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6700
Asus(1043 03F4) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
8.21% Terrible
Lighting 10.9
Reflection 11
Parallax 9.8
9% 10.6 fps
MRender 9.2
Gravity 8.6
Splatting 7.8
7% 8.53 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.21%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 510 Series 120GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PPG4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 189 192 194 195 194 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 319
Write 194
Mixed 209
SusWrite 191
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 22.6
80% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 21.5
DQ Write 51.7
DQ Mixed 25.4
23% 32.9 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
466GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 128 129 128 129 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 114
Write 112
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 128
70% 96.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 0.9
253% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BA1339.M16F 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
53.1% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 16.9
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 23.8" 1280 720 PHLC25D PHL 241E2F
Typical P8H67-M Builds (Compare 400 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $206
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback