Jingsha To be filled by O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics33.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardJingsha To be filled by O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory121 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200629
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '24 at 16:30
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 69.9
1-Core 65.1
2-Core 128
52% 87.5 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 527
46% 394 Pts
64-Core 1,304
81% 1,304 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
MSI(1462 2990) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.74
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.9% Below average
Lighting 39.3
Reflection 37.7
Parallax 50.7
32% 42.6 fps
MRender 53.4
Gravity 48.6
Splatting 38.8
38% 46.9 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP1000GM30013 1TB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SU6SM005
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 723
Write 1,120
Mixed 886
205% 910 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 64.5
4K Mixed 32.1
116% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 465
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 386
281% 371 MB/s
Poor: 236% Great: 508%
USB DISK 3.0 64GB
55GB free, PID 9917
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 132
Write 90.1
Mixed 104
133% 109 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 2.5
196% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 38%
PNY ATTACHE OPTIMA 8GB
7GB free, PID 3100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 23.7
Write 6.5
Mixed 6
12% 12.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
12% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT42GR7BFR4A 4x16GB
4 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
46.6% Average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 16.8
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 5.1
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 54 60 23.5" 1920 1017 AOC2450 2450W
Typical To be filled by O.E.M. Builds (Compare 55 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Jingsha To be filled by O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $429
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback