Gigabyte GA-Z490 AORUS XTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 193%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 202%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics185% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive331% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z490 AORUS XTREME  (all builds)
Memory21.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210419
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 18 '24 at 16:24
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900K-$430
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 97.3
1-Core 156
2-Core 311
103% 188 Pts
4-Core 607
8-Core 1104
103% 855 Pts
64-Core 1,925
119% 1,925 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
185% Outstanding
Lighting 270
Reflection 339
Parallax 280
220% 296 fps
MRender 305
Gravity 220
Splatting 165
181% 230 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 185%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2022 2029 2032 2047 2052 2059 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
331% Outstanding
Read 2,449
Write 2,227
Mixed 1,671
SusWrite 2,040
471% 2,097 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 62.7
214% 77.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,116
DQ Write 761
DQ Mixed 934
698% 937 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 331%
Great: 488%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
94GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 185 82 80 74 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 333
Mixed 400
SusWrite 161
77% 347 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 89.7
4K Mixed 43.4
150% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 351
265% 356 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 121%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$104
86GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 182 80 80 82 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 478
Mixed 439
SusWrite 164
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 87.3
4K Mixed 48.2
162% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 356
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 128%
Hitachi HUS726T4TALA6L4 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: VLGNW460
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 186 193 185 194 188 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 177
Mixed 91.8
SusWrite 190
115% 158 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 1.8
376% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 104%
Great: 125%
Hitachi HUS726T4TALA6L4 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: VLGNW460
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 186 186 185 185 186 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 61% Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 4600 C19 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 43.2
MC Write 45.4
MC Mixed 33.7
116% 40.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 45.6
SC Mixed 33.3
96% 33.4 GB/s
Latency 48.9
82% 48.9 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 114%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 30: 0P 3R 5G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 14% 49 202 48 240 48.7" 4096 1152 SAM7053 LC49G95T
History: Score 19: 0P 2R 2G 3B | Score 30: 0P 3R 5G 0B
Typical GA-Z490 AORUS XTREME Builds (Compare 292 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 206%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 220%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z490 AORUS XTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $1,734
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback