MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 35% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	43.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C09
Motherboard	MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09) (all builds)
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180712
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Jan 18 '24 at 15:25
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$98 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	83.7% Excellent	Memory 81.5 1-Core 118 2-Core 237 81% 146 Pts	4-Core 473 8-Core 612 69% 543 Pts	64-Core 602 37% 602 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% PNY(196E 1327) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	43.6% Average	Lighting 56.8 Reflection 57 Parallax 49.4 46% 54.4 fps	MRender 42.1 Gravity 52.1 Splatting 46.6 38% 46.9 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 40 76 71 16 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	32.2% Below average	Read 344 Write 106 Mixed 55.7 SusWrite 53 30% 140 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 11.2 4K Mixed 10.4 48% 13.4 MB/s	DQ Read 28.4 DQ Write 16.5 DQ Mixed 16.7 14% 20.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 100%
Kesu USB 3.0 320GB 258 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 117GB free Firmware: 0209 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 41 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	25.9% Poor	Read 49.8 Write 38.2 Mixed 30.6 SusWrite 40.2 29% 39.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 116% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905678-173.A00G 2x8GB 297 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	MC Read 28.6 MC Write 30.1 MC Mixed 22.3 77% 27 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 29.9 SC Mixed 20.9 64% 22.4 GB/s	Latency 78.5 51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	46	11	60	27.9"	1920 1057	BNQ7949 BenQ EL2870U

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09) Builds (Compare 6,369 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	2,320x
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	1,509x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	292x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	636x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	463x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	360x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	459x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	283x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $50Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	206x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	203x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	166x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples	155x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $355

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16