Asus P8H61-M LE

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	7.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	29.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8H61-M LE (all builds)
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110510
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jan 18 '24 at 14:03
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	67%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2100-$49 63,701 User benchmarks, average bench 51% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	59.1% Above average	Memory 89.9 1-Core 76 2-Core 127 62% 97.5 Pts	4-Core 165 8-Core 178 23% 172 Pts	64-Core 173 11% 173 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450 25,436 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Asus(1043 83A6) 1GB CLim: 811 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	7.32% Terrible	Lighting 8.3 Reflection 11.8 Parallax 9.8 7% 9.97 fps	MRender 12.5 Gravity 10 Splatting 8.9 8% 10.5 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.32% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03090004 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 46 48 49 33 43 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.6% Poor	Read 139 Write 55.7 Mixed 97.9 SusWrite 42.3 18% 83.6 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 28.8 4K Mixed 14.3 66% 21.5 MB/s	DQ Read 29.6 DQ Write 48.7 DQ Mixed 11.3 16% 29.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 375GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 136 148 153 150 132 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Read 113 Write 106 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 143 77% 106 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 212% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5458-005.A01LF 8GB 93 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.2% Average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 15.4 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 13.5 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 65.9 61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	32	11	60	20"	1600 877	PHLC033 Philips 201E

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H61-M LE Builds (Compare 1,012 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE - $134

CPU
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	163x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	110x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	83x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	158x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	79x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	35x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	47x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	29x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	28x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	20x
859B CT51264BA160B.C16F 8GBUnknownBench 53%, 62 samples	18x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $211

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16