Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JAB_X515JA

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JAB_X515JA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X515JAB
Memory	0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210719
Uptime	30.9 Days
Run Date	Jan 18 '24 at 13:26
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	63%

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 6805 50 User benchmarks, average bench 55% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	38.4% Below average	Memory 49.8 1-Core 77.6 2-Core 131 49% 86.3 Pts	4-Core 154 8-Core 170 21% 162 Pts	64-Core 167 10% 167 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD G1 68,603 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1F9C) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864 Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	3.71% Terrible	Lighting 5.3 Reflection 2.9 Parallax 5.6 4% 4.6 fps	MRender 4.6 Gravity 5.5 Splatting 0.3 2% 3.47 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.71% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Foresee P900F128GH 128GB 300 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: V2.7.7H SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 92 63 57 63 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	40.5% Average	Read 407 Write 109 Mixed 160 SusWrite 79.1 41% 189 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 18.9 4K Mixed 15.2 38% 13.3 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 201 DQ Mixed 50.8 68% 121 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 1x4GB 6,590 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	26.3% Poor	MC Read 12.4 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 7.3 26% 9.23 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 8.6 SC Mixed 4.3 21% 7.37 GB/s	Latency 154 26% 154 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 17: 0P 3R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
17%	20%	25	52	20	60	15.5"	1280 720	NCP0046

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JAB_X515JA Builds (Compare 1,017 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JAB_X515JA

CPU
Core i3-1005G1IntelBench 44%, 22,960 samples	407x
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples	335x
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples	267x

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	750x
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	267x

SSD
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples	340x
INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBNvmeBench 197%, 18,245 samples	156x
Micron_2450_MTFDKBA512TFK 512GBBench 203%, 4,667 samples	101x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CWE 2x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 26,749 samples	194x
M471A5244CB0-CWE Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 8GBSamsungBench 57%, 2,191 samples	184x
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 19,438 samples	140x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16