Gigabyte GA-Z97M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '24 at 18:29
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4170-$20
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 92.4
1-Core 96.7
2-Core 154
70% 114 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 230
27% 211 Pts
64-Core 231
14% 231 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 360
Sapphire(174B E258) 2GB
CLim: 1060 MHz, MLim: 1625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.5
Reflection 26.7
Parallax 28.4
18% 25.5 fps
MRender 24.6
Gravity 21.7
Splatting 24.6
19% 23.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03090005
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 98 41 19 21 42 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.1% Average
Read 197
Write 141
Mixed 243
SusWrite 61.7
36% 161 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 31.2
4K Mixed 26.4
89% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 68.8
DQ Mixed 108
80% 106 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 85%
Toshiba MK5059GSXP 500GB-$50
8GB free
Firmware: GN001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 66 65 65 65 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 44.6
Write 45.3
Mixed 17.4
SusWrite 64.8
31% 43 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 44%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
9GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 54 54 54 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 65.8
Write 37.2
Mixed 45.3
SusWrite 54.7
38% 50.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 59%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
264GB free
Firmware: AX1P4M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 66 66 66 66 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 59.7
Write 67.3
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 65.5
41% 55.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965525-018.A00LF KHX1866C10D3/4G MAGNUMTECH 12GB
2000, 2000, 2000 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.7% Good
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 21.3
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 20.3
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 59.6
67% 59.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 3 60 18.5" 1280 720 GSM4C18 19EN33
Typical GA-Z97M-D3H Builds (Compare 787 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97M-D3H - $126

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $589
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback