Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results


Gaming 107% UFO	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 98% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 months ago, 1 month ago.

Motherboard	Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds)
Memory	24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190515
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 16 '24 at 19:54
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	29%

Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700-$260 79,875 User benchmarks, average bench 92% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	93.5% Outstanding	Memory 86.2 1-Core 133 2-Core 266 89% 162 Pts	4-Core 541 8-Core 906 88% 724 Pts	64-Core 973 60% 973 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 93.5% Great: 99%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% EVGA(3842 3071) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33 Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	114% Outstanding	Lighting 147 Reflection 149 Parallax 146 120% 147 fps	MRender 181 Gravity 130 Splatting 115 113% 142 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 123%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX7000 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$155 2,976 User benchmarks, average bench 126% 295GB free (System drive) Firmware: CB1.1.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 490 276 331 513 122 121 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 694 Write 728 Mixed 648 SusWrite 309 134% 595 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 60.2 4K Mixed 35.7 116% 40.4 MB/s	DQ Read 490 DQ Write 674 DQ Mixed 511 406% 558 MB/s
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 142%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown MD4U1632160DCW 2x16GB 81 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75.3% Very good	MC Read 29.5 MC Write 28.1 MC Mixed 22.9 77% 26.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 28.5 SC Mixed 23 65% 22.7 GB/s	Latency 74.7 54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	31	11	120	23.8"	1920 1080	AUS2421 ASUS VG249

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B365M Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 1,965 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 92%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 67%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	652x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	205x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	169x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	127x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	114x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	111x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	65x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	55x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	42x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	95x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	50x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	45x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $544

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16