MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics89.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231013
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 16 '24 at 19:29
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 71%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 93.3
1-Core 179
2-Core 356
112% 210 Pts
4-Core 679
8-Core 1194
113% 937 Pts
64-Core 1,550
96% 1,550 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 110%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$287
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.9% Excellent
Lighting 116
Reflection 104
Parallax 108
94% 109 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 93.3
Splatting 85.6
82% 102 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Firecuda 1TB
360GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SU6S
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2315 1678 803 766 791 805 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 59% Great: 271%
WDC WD40 EZAZ-19SF3B0 4TB
497GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 95 96 94 95 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 186
Write 158
Mixed 95.3
SusWrite 95.3
30% 134 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 10.6
4K Mixed 1.1
18% 6.37 MB/s
DQ Read 1.5
DQ Write 13.8
DQ Mixed 0.6
3% 5.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C17D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 35.1
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 31.3
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 39.7
93% 32.6 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 57 60 27" 1920 1080 HPN3579 HP 27m
Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,553 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,012
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback