Blade Shadow Computer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics139% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemBlade Shadow Computer  (all builds)
MotherboardBlade ShadowM
Memory24.4 GB free of 28 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '24 at 17:41
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7543P 32-Core
CPU1 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 130
2-Core 239
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 554
57% 461 Pts
64-Core 570
35% 570 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A4500
Nvidia(10DE 163C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 20GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
139% Outstanding
Lighting 183
Reflection 187
Parallax 200
149% 190 fps
MRender 239
Gravity 161
Splatting 153
147% 184 fps
Poor: 133%
This bench: 139%
Great: 155%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 825GB
768GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 125 125 125 125 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 525
Write 131
Mixed 258
SusWrite 125
57% 260 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 34.6
4K Mixed 36.4
128% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 93.7
DQ Mixed 95.8
73% 97.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 126%
Qemu HARDDISK 550GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 125 125 125 125 125 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Blade Y9HOV7BFPHR3FI-KGA Y9HOV7BFPHR3FI-KGA 28GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 12288 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
98.8% Outstanding
MC Read 39.4
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 36.6
101% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 40.5
SC Mixed 33.5
94% 32.8 GB/s
Latency 91.6
44% 91.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 59 45 60 0" 1920 1017 BLD3320 HP 24er
Typical Shadow Computer Builds (Compare 607 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Blade Shadow Computer

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback