Asus V220IC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive61.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (86%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus V220IC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK V220IC
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20151110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '24 at 16:14
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 86%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
1151p, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
48.2% Average
Memory 78.8
1-Core 52.1
2-Core 91.5
48% 74.1 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 95.7
14% 102 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Intel(8086 1916) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
5.11% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 5.9
4% 5.43 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 5
Splatting 11.2
7% 7.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.11%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dahua C800 2.5 inch SATA 512GB SSD
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0609B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 283 304 288 352 367 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 406
Write 347
Mixed 336
SusWrite 310
79% 350 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 36.1
4K Mixed 16.4
69% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 40.9
55% 100 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAG68EXNSA051N 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.3% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 18.7
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 15.7
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 21.6" 1280 720 ACIE330 Z220IC
Typical V220IC Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus V220IC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback