MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 166%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics187% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory38 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210629
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 16 '24 at 13:13
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Memory 81.4
1-Core 162
2-Core 307
99% 183 Pts
4-Core 537
8-Core 837
85% 687 Pts
64-Core 953
59% 953 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910
Asus(1043 87AC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
187% Outstanding
Lighting 277
Reflection 225
Parallax 262
226% 255 fps
MRender 292
Gravity 216
Splatting 158
174% 222 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 187%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,185
Write 1,152
Mixed 1,369
346% 1,569 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 65.4
212% 74.8 MB/s
DQ Read 983
DQ Write 768
DQ Mixed 902
667% 884 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
131GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 311 300 317 315 314 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 422
Write 443
Mixed 339
SusWrite 324
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 98.6
4K Mixed 50
172% 61.9 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 368
278% 371 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 107%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$98
170GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 231 81 82 81 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 443
Mixed 366
SusWrite 163
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 45.3
159% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 371
279% 372 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 121%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$180
1.5TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 110 107 105 102 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 144
Write 140
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 108
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 97%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$90
2.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 136 129 138 136 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 146
Write 139
Mixed 85.2
SusWrite 135
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 48GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 35.2
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 26.2
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 32.8
76% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 34: 0P 5R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
34% 23% 43 217 60 240 27" 1280 720 AUS278F VG279QM
Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,544 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $881
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback