Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results


Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 103% UFO	Workstation 81% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	65.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

4 months ago, 4 months ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE (all builds)
Memory	23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20231225
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 16 '24 at 11:20
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	IRL-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	99.5% Outstanding	Memory 91.3 1-Core 146 2-Core 291 96% 176 Pts	4-Core 576 8-Core 1,139 101% 857 Pts	64-Core 2,259 140% 2,259 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 99.5% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% MSI(1462 8D95) CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 3650 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.33 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	65.3% Good	Lighting 83.6 Reflection 85.4 Parallax 81.5 68% 83.5 fps	MRender 77.5 Gravity 79.2 Splatting 65.4 60% 74 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,693 Write 2,617 Mixed 1,852 531% 2,387 MB/s	4K Read 68.1 4K Write 188 4K Mixed 98.4 328% 118 MB/s	DQ Read 1,466 DQ Write 1,169 DQ Mixed 1,259 958% 1298 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 519GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1921 1712 1658 1658 1663 1664 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	369% Outstanding	Read 2,566 Write 1855 Mixed 1,766 SusWrite 1,713 442% 1,975 MB/s	4K Read 68.2 4K Write 176 4K Mixed 96.4 320% 114 MB/s	DQ Read 1,563 DQ Write 1,242 DQ Mixed 1,357 1,028% 1,387 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 369% Great: 372%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BL16G36C16U4WL.M16FE 2x16GB 298 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	124% Outstanding	MC Read 49.7 MC Write 43.2 MC Mixed 45.2 132% 46 GB/s	SC Read 29 SC Write 26.9 SC Mixed 42.5 94% 32.8 GB/s	Latency 65.1 62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 137%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	57	60	23.8"	1280 720	DEL4168 DELL U2419HC

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,809 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 159%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 161%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	2,151x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,724x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,262x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $879Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	919x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	887x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	701x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	600x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	432x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	398x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	305x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	300x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	278x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $1,447

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16