Gigabyte GA-H510M DS2V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H510M DS2V  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210823
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJan 16 '24 at 05:10
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700K-$231
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 69.4
1-Core 159
2-Core 301
93% 177 Pts
4-Core 589
8-Core 972
95% 781 Pts
64-Core 1,533
95% 1,533 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 158
Reflection 157
Parallax 167
128% 161 fps
MRender 178
Gravity 134
Splatting 114
113% 142 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 119%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03090005
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 429
Write 284
Mixed 285
74% 333 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 6.8
69% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 49.8
DQ Mixed 96.6
66% 83.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
546GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 108 108 108 108 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 170
Write 188
Mixed 84.6
SusWrite 107
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 113%
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB
155GB free
Firmware: VE0R840H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 330 380 383 383 378 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 1% Great: 55%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
58GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 107 107 104 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 83.4
Write 90.6
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 106
107% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$45
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
55.6% Above average
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 18
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 13.2
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 96.5
42% 96.5 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 55 165 33.9" 1280 720 KGN0D48 KAMN34RQUCSB
Typical GA-H510M DS2V Builds (Compare 162 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H510M DS2V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback