MSI MS-16R5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive213% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star GF63 Thin 10SC
MotherboardMSI MS-16R5  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210830
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '24 at 03:35
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
87% Excellent
Memory 94
1-Core 123
2-Core 244
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 610
66% 522 Pts
64-Core 587
36% 587 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 87%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 12F4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
4.88% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 7.5
5% 7.67 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 0.3
4% 6.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.88%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2400_MTFD 512GB
432GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA001 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1628 1595 1618 395 77 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
213% Outstanding
Read 1,678
Write 1573
Mixed 1,392
SusWrite 899
311% 1,385 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 36
185% 68.8 MB/s
DQ Read 925
DQ Write 719
DQ Mixed 842
625% 829 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 213%
Great: 271%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE Kingston 9905700-118.A00G 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 22.9
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 25
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO21ED
Typical MS-16R5 Builds (Compare 4,833 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback