Asus Z170 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160919
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 15 '24 at 19:47
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 96.2
1-Core 132
2-Core 240
89% 156 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 674
68% 552 Pts
64-Core 670
42% 670 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Nvidia(10DE 13A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 112
Parallax 128
102% 122 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 113
Splatting 104
106% 134 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5216
Write 45.5
Mixed 90.9
370% 1,784 MB/s
4K Read 470
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 4.8
720% 159 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 114%
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
265GB free
Firmware: P9CR30C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,630
Write 1,933
Mixed 1,756
398% 1,773 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 65.3
214% 75.2 MB/s
DQ Read 940
DQ Write 534
DQ Mixed 852
603% 775 MB/s
Poor: 102% Great: 394%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$54
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 166
Write 188
Mixed 92.6
110% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 112%
Integral Courier 4GB
4GB free, PID 3100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 19.5
Write 8.7
Mixed 8.5
14% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
29% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
MC Read 35.4
MC Write 37.8
MC Mixed 31.1
99% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 40.1
SC Mixed 29.4
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 54.4
74% 54.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 31.5" 1280 720 AOC3202 Q32G2WG3
Typical Z170 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 1,512 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING/AURA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $582
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback