Biostar A320MH

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	23.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

9 months ago, 9 months ago, 3 months ago.

Motherboard	Biostar A320MH (all builds)
Memory	2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190520
Uptime	4.8 Days
Run Date	Jan 15 '24 at 18:59
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104 181,631 User benchmarks, average bench 60% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Memory 73.4 1-Core 91.4 2-Core 183 66% 116 Pts	4-Core 365 8-Core 358 48% 361 Pts	64-Core 379 24% 379 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% Asus(1043 04BC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1275 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.11.1 Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	23.5% Poor	Lighting 28.4 Reflection 29.4 Parallax 39.6 23% 32.5 fps	MRender 28.6 Gravity 33.4 Splatting 27 24% 29.7 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Biostar S100-256GB 256GB 336 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 122 201 143 145 105 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	65.8% Good	Read 440 Write 386 Mixed 220 SusWrite 146 66% 298 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 62.4 4K Mixed 22.1 106% 37.9 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 167 DQ Mixed 32.7 64% 129 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 92%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 98GB free Firmware: MS2OA8R0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 125 99 122 105 91 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Read 149 Write 135 Mixed 20.1 SusWrite 106 74% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL19-19-19 D4-2666 1x8GB 2,264 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	44.5% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 14.6 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 15.1 SC Mixed 14.9 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 94.8 42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	42	6	60	18.5"	1280 720	PHLC04E Philips 192EL

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320MH Builds (Compare 1,807 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar A320MH

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	266x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	196x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	123x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	128x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	125x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	111x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	114x
CS900 500GB SSDPNYBench 75%, 16,267 samples	76x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	47x

RAM
CL16-18-18 D4-3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 78%, 40,300 samples	48x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	43x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GBTeamBench 78%, 7,481 samples	39x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $333

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16