Asus PRIME Z390-P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Graphics99.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive89.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z390-P  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190603
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '24 at 04:47
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$137
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Memory 95.7
96% 95.7 Pts
Poor: 82% Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3525 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 176
Parallax 116
102% 139 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 110
Splatting 101
93% 116 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK256TBN 256GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MA020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 441 155 141 146 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 469
Write 480
Mixed 398
SusWrite 245
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 93.7
4K Mixed 39.2
142% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 305
219% 278 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 212 212 212 212 212 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 212
Write 173
Mixed 88.8
SusWrite 212
125% 171 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 121%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 41.4
MC Write 42.8
MC Mixed 34.4
113% 39.5 GB/s
SC Read 24
SC Write 46.4
SC Mixed 31.8
97% 34.1 GB/s
Latency 55
73% 55 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 111%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 52: 0P 5R 7G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
52% 23% 77 218 60 144 24" 1280 720 ACI24AE MG248
Typical PRIME Z390-P Builds (Compare 18,515 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z390-P - $106

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $690
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback