Advan 1701

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAdvan 1701  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231108
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateJan 15 '24 at 03:39
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
40.6% Average
Memory 62.2
1-Core 48.4
2-Core 69.3
40% 60 Pts
4-Core 105
8-Core 150
16% 127 Pts
64-Core 217
13% 217 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7
Device(1E50 8038) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2125
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
8.38% Terrible
Lighting 12.1
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 10.3
10% 10.3 fps
MRender 9.2
Gravity 13.5
Splatting 0.2
6% 7.63 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.38%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Airdisk 256GB SSD 256GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0808A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 114 141 142 92 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 1,593
Write 279
Mixed 192
SusWrite 140
118% 551 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 62.7
4K Mixed 23.7
117% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 294
217% 288 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 120%
Great: 147%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 04CB 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
61.4% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 23
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 14" 1920 1177 BOE0ACD
Typical 1701 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Advan 1701

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback