Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H310M-R R2.0  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190524
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 15 '24 at 02:14
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User MKD-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$110
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 91.6
1-Core 111
2-Core 163
74% 122 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 395
54% 399 Pts
64-Core 376
23% 376 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
46.7% Average
Lighting 58.3
Reflection 55.9
Parallax 80.3
48% 64.8 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 65.3
Splatting 44.4
45% 56.6 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3500102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 175 25 140 220 109 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
143GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 104 105 107 107 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 139
Write 129
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 105
71% 98 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
59.4% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 18.6
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 19.1
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 20: 0P 1R 3G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
20% 20% 50 195 25 165 23.8" 1280 720 MSI9BA4 MSI G2412
Typical PRIME H310M-R R2.0 Builds (Compare 4,254 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback