MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive780% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C56
MotherboardMSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)  (all builds)
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220317
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJan 15 '24 at 02:01
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$240
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 93.5
1-Core 176
2-Core 348
110% 206 Pts
4-Core 664
8-Core 1,294
116% 979 Pts
64-Core 2,169
134% 2,169 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 109%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,135
EVGA(3842 3982) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 546.33
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 352
Reflection 304
Parallax 387
287% 348 fps
Gravity 273
Splatting 191
200% 232 fps
Poor: 185% Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS3030 2TB SSD
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS213530
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 46 37 38 11 6.3 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
780% Outstanding
Read 11362
Write 72.6
Mixed 129
SusWrite 31
602% 2,899 MB/s
4K Read 798
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 8.2
1,222% 270 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 780%
Great: 315%
Realtek RTL9210 NVME 1TB
397GB free
Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 203 262 267 86 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 171
Write 781
Mixed 314
SusWrite 172
82% 359 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 49.4
158% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 309
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 0.4
85% 205 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 133%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
781GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 157 203 189 68 48 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 507
Write 468
Mixed 440
SusWrite 131
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 71.9
4K Mixed 44.3
149% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 112
125% 217 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 99%
Gen4 4TB 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: VG001C32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 29 38 38 11 6.6 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
665% Outstanding
Read 7,932
Write 79.7
Mixed 153
SusWrite 24.5
426% 2,047 MB/s
4K Read 853
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 9.5
1,307% 289 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 665%
Great: 567%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SBK2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 98 109 103 44 45 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
42% Average
Read 64.3
Write 116
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 80.7
60% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.6
184% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 42%
Great: 67%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 99 115 110 55 50 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 116
Write 133
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 86.1
72% 98.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 71%
Asmt109x- Volume 2TB
592GB free
Firmware: T0529A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 0 0 0 58 68 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4133 C18 Series 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
136% Outstanding
MC Read 66
MC Write 43.4
MC Mixed 44.6
147% 51.3 GB/s
SC Read 31.4
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 41.4
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 60
67% 60 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 136%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 69.5" 1280 720 VIZ1039 V705-J03
Typical MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) Builds (Compare 16,103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $663
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback