| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 42.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Intel H61 (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190417 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 14 '24 at 22:34 |
| Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 39% |
PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
55.6%
Above average
|
58% 97.2 Pts
|
29% 220 Pts
|
14% 227 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42.4%
Average
|
46% 52.1 fps
|
35% 43.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03090004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 8.2 41 44 46 MB/s
|
36.5%
Below average
|
22% 100 MB/s
|
64% 23.6 MB/s
|
55% 83.3 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
418GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 122 122 125 122 MB/s
|
81.6%
Excellent
|
96% 131 MB/s
|
150% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX 1600 C10 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
20.5%
Poor
|
18% 6.37 GB/s
|
18% 6.4 GB/s
|
42% 96.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 1 | 181 | 18 | 60 | 21.7" | 1312 720 | SAM08A5 S19B300 |
Typical H61 Builds (Compare 10,260 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Intel H61
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 1,990x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 1,005x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 991x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 2,023x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 1,354x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 716x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |