QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics77.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230606
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 14 '24 at 21:19
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
41.1% Average
Memory 51.3
1-Core 35.6
2-Core 87.2
35% 58 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 427
34% 297 Pts
64-Core 983
61% 983 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.33
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.3% Very good
Lighting 88.1
Reflection 118
Parallax 137
72% 115 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 104
Splatting 89.2
88% 110 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 859GB
223GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 165 84 4.3 39 33 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 81%
Qemu HARDDISK 3.5TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 176 132 94 39 39 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.1% Above average
Read 582
Write 232
Mixed 372
SusWrite 107
71% 324 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 12.2
4K Mixed 12.6
43% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 179
141% 195 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM RAM
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
63.9% Good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 25.5
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 9
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 231%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 23 165 27" 2560 1369 HPN3724 HP X27q
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback