Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results


Gaming 78% Battleship	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 79% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	78.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	373% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds)
Memory	55 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230118
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 14 '24 at 13:48
Run Duration	342 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180 128,080 User benchmarks, average bench 98% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	96.2% Outstanding	Memory 73 1-Core 171 2-Core 339 101% 194 Pts	4-Core 639 8-Core 1,112 106% 875 Pts	64-Core 1436 89% 1436 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 96.2% Great: 112%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% Gigabyte(1458 3FBE) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	78.1% Very good	Lighting 99.8 Reflection 99.3 Parallax 89.9 81% 96.3 fps	MRender 99.1 Gravity 90.4 Splatting 78.2 72% 89.2 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$106 276,089 User benchmarks, average bench 394% 426GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2933 2985 1601 1467 1162 1088 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	373% Outstanding	Read 2,762 Write 3217 Mixed 2,958 SusWrite 1,872 610% 2,702 MB/s	4K Read 75.7 4K Write 152 4K Mixed 100 324% 109 MB/s	DQ Read 1,217 DQ Write 905 DQ Mixed 1,008 768% 1,043 MB/s
Poor: 274% ↑ This bench: 373% Great: 488%
CT4000P3PSSD8 4TB 6,289 User benchmarks, average bench 360% 1TB free Firmware: P9CR40A SusWrite @10s intervals: 3595 3775 3664 3749 3796 3666 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	438% Outstanding	Read 1,881 Write 3,812 Mixed 2,371 SusWrite 3,707 671% 2,943 MB/s	4K Read 54.1 4K Write 176 4K Mixed 77.3 274% 102 MB/s	DQ Read 1,346 DQ Write 992 DQ Mixed 1,157 868% 1,165 MB/s
Poor: 137% ↑ This bench: 438% Great: 530%
WD WD101EMAZ-11G7DA0 10TB 179 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 5TB free Firmware: 81.00A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 157 150 148 154 156 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Read 133 Write 147 Mixed 84.2 SusWrite 154 95% 130 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 1.4 355% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 118%
Seagate ST10000NE0008-2JM101 10TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 7.5TB free Firmware: EN01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 215 213 213 215 213 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 112%
Generic S600 HARD DRIVE 6TB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 5TB free Firmware: FS2B SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 193 186 184 192 190 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 177 Write 163 Mixed 91.3 SusWrite 188 113% 155 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 192% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 111%
WD WD120EMAZ-11BLFA0 12TB 255 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2.5TB free Firmware: 81.00A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 160 159 160 161 160 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 54% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 159 157 156 158 162 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	66.5% Good	Read 74.3 Write 122 Mixed 75.6 SusWrite 158 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 30% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 4TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 127 128 128 127 126 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	50.6% Above average	Read 49.7 Write 91.3 Mixed 66 SusWrite 127 62% 83.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 55% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMG32GX4M2D3600C18 4x16GB 328 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	65.8% Good	MC Read 27.1 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 25.8 66% 23 GB/s	SC Read 24.6 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 26.8 64% 22.4 GB/s	Latency 91.8 44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 129%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	72	60	60	31.5"	1280 720	GSM76F5 32inch LG FHD

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,879 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 117%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $89Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	507x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	488x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $110Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	362x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	242x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	189x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	162x

SSD
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	112x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	102x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	70x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	100x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	74x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	73x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $703

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16