Samsung 500R5K/501R5K/500R5Q

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Samsung 500R5K/501R5K/500R5Q (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NT500R5K-K38D
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150324
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jan 14 '24 at 12:30
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-5005U 50,603 User benchmarks, average bench 38% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	Memory 53.1 1-Core 52 2-Core 94.3 40% 66.5 Pts	4-Core 111 8-Core 130 16% 121 Pts	64-Core 121 8% 121 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz) 231,498 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Sanyo(144D C757) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549 Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	3.08% Terrible	Lighting 3.7 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 5.2 3% 3.57 fps	MRender 3.6 Gravity 3.7 Splatting 4.3 3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.08% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon L8H-128V2G 128GB 93 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: F872001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 134 135 134 137 139 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	47.9% Average	Read 326 Write 129 Mixed 170 SusWrite 135 42% 190 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 33.1 4K Mixed 18.5 63% 21.9 MB/s	DQ Read 182 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 132 106% 150 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 83%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 444GB free Firmware: AM002F SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 105 104 104 106 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	Read 92.5 Write 83.4 Mixed 24.2 SusWrite 104 55% 76 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.3 56% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GB 44,908 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19.3% Very poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 5.7 18% 6.47 GB/s	SC Read 5.1 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 5.5 15% 5.23 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	44	33	60	15.5"	1536 801	BOE062B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 500R5K/501R5K/500R5Q Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 500R5K/501R5K/500R5Q

CPU
Core i5-5200UIntelBench 42%, 107,407 samples	8x
Core i3-5005UIntelBench 38%, 50,603 samples	3x
Pentium 3805UIntelBench 44%, 990 samples	2x

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	8x
GeForce 840MNvidiaBench 9%, 20,978 samples	4x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 3,725 samples	2x

SSD
L8H-128V2G 128GBLiteonBench 66%, 93 samples	4x
CT1000MX500SSD4 1TBBench 107%, 26,659 samples	2x
MZNTE128HMGR-000 128GBSamsungBench 56%, 270 samples	2x

RAM
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 44,908 samples	12x
M471B1G73DM0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 316 samples	1x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 40,451 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16