Default X670E PG Lightning

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 357%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 463%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 127%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics293% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive514% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDefault X670E PG Lightning  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock X670E PG Lightning
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220831
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 14 '24 at 11:36
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$487
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Memory 90.6
1-Core 221
2-Core 448
131% 253 Pts
4-Core 873
8-Core 1,720
153% 1,297 Pts
64-Core 3,920
243% 3,920 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 127%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XTX-$1,000
Gigabyte(1458 240D) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 24GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
293% Outstanding
Lighting 392
Reflection 525
Parallax 857
320% 592 fps
MRender 560
Gravity 335
Splatting 499
382% 465 fps
Poor: 221%
This bench: 293%
Great: 294%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TB
615GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 614900WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2594 4338 2275 1816 1618 1627 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
514% Outstanding
Read 3,789
Write 4,461
Mixed 3,084
SusWrite 2,378
772% 3,428 MB/s
4K Read 72.3
4K Write 292
4K Mixed 105
398% 156 MB/s
DQ Read 2,416
DQ Write 1,880
DQ Mixed 2,038
1,554% 2,111 MB/s
Poor: 264%
This bench: 514%
Great: 573%
Fanxiang S880 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SN11273
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3862 4153 4141 4138 4056 2837 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
552% Outstanding
Read 3,508
Write 3,569
Mixed 2523
SusWrite 3,864
759% 3,366 MB/s
4K Read 58.5
4K Write 214
4K Mixed 102
332% 125 MB/s
DQ Read 1,833
DQ Write 1,398
DQ Mixed 1,555
1,179% 1,595 MB/s
Poor: 245%
This bench: 552%
Great: 611%
Fanxiang S880 1TB
604GB free
Firmware: SN11273
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2453 2391 2366 1982 1267 714 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
379% Outstanding
Read 1,992
Write 2,146
Mixed 1,917
SusWrite 1862
447% 1,979 MB/s
4K Read 55
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 97.4
308% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 2,345
DQ Write 1,688
DQ Mixed 1,601
1,309% 1,878 MB/s
Poor: 247%
This bench: 379%
Great: 543%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX5U6000C4016G-DCLAW 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
216% Outstanding
MC Read 89.5
MC Write 73.2
MC Mixed 78.6
230% 80.4 GB/s
SC Read 58.2
SC Write 67.8
SC Mixed 66.6
183% 64.2 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 148%
This bench: 216%
Great: 218%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 33.1" 1280 720 AOC3279 Q3279WG5B
Typical X670E PG Lightning Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 140%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 147%
UFO

System: Default X670E PG Lightning

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $860
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback