MSI B550-A PRO (MS-7C56)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 238%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 228%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics214% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive357% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C56
MotherboardMSI B550-A PRO (MS-7C56)  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231011
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '24 at 09:02
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$168
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 95.9
1-Core 180
2-Core 357
113% 211 Pts
4-Core 711
8-Core 1,202
116% 957 Pts
64-Core 1,435
89% 1,435 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 114%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080 12GB
Asus(1043 886F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 5000 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
214% Outstanding
Lighting 312
Reflection 288
Parallax 350
254% 317 fps
MRender 376
Gravity 256
Splatting 196
216% 276 fps
Poor: 143%
This bench: 214%
Great: 211%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
450GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2480 2248 1838 1866 1872 1862 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
357% Outstanding
Read 2,594
Write 2,950
Mixed 2,776
SusWrite 2,028
584% 2,587 MB/s
4K Read 61.9
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 80.1
255% 84 MB/s
DQ Read 1,275
DQ Write 955
DQ Mixed 1,102
828% 1,111 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 357%
Great: 488%
V-GEN07SM19EG480GBIT 480GB
127GB free
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 410 118 96 74 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 508
Write 443
Mixed 391
SusWrite 197
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 24.6
120% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 36.3
86% 171 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
200GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 127 129 128 122 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 94.6
Write 129
Mixed 64.8
SusWrite 127
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
69% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 106%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
352GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 109 111 111 111 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 78.9
Write 80.7
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 111
62% 83.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
181% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 49.8
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 44.5
118% 41.4 GB/s
SC Read 34.1
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 44
103% 36 GB/s
Latency 54.1
74% 54.1 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 116%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 68: 0P 5R 10G 13B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
47% 34% 38 194 10 60 37" 1280 720 SHP1056 SHARP HDMI
History: Score 47: 0P 5R 7G 1B | Score 68: 0P 5R 10G 13B
Typical B550-A PRO (MS-7C56) Builds (Compare 9,642 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI B550-A PRO (MS-7C56)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $758
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback