Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 149%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics156% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive294% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory44 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220512
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateJan 13 '24 at 05:43
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 81.1
1-Core 107
2-Core 214
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 839
75% 632 Pts
64-Core 2,092
130% 2,092 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$459
Nvidia(10DE 14B2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
156% Outstanding
Lighting 229
Reflection 206
Parallax 201
187% 212 fps
MRender 243
Gravity 153
Splatting 126
136% 174 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 156%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$103
527GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1525 1290 1298 1365 1421 1435 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
294% Outstanding
Read 2,356
Write 2,283
Mixed 1,742
SusWrite 1,389
436% 1,942 MB/s
4K Read 55.2
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 76.7
246% 84.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,103
DQ Write 631
DQ Mixed 874
648% 869 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 294%
Great: 410%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 187 197 190 196 194 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 200
Mixed 139
SusWrite 193
134% 183 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 7
4K Mixed 1.7
473% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 113%
Great: 136%
Mass Storage Device 394GB
366GB free, PID 1212
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 19.6
Write 18.7
Mixed 18.7
24% 19 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 4.1
273% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MD4U1632160DCW 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 40.2
MC Write 34.7
MC Mixed 36.9
106% 37.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 32.6
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 100%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 58 31 240 24.5" 1280 720 HPN360E OMEN X 25f
Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,824 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback