Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IHRB_FA506IHRB

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IHRB_FA506IHRB (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FA506IHRB
Memory	1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20221228
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '24 at 22:04
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	CRI-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H 27,218 User benchmarks, average bench 70% FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	67.2% Good	Memory 74.8 1-Core 118 2-Core 202 75% 132 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 499 51% 410 Pts	64-Core 542 34% 542 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 8,686 User benchmarks, average bench 39% Asus(1043 16ED) ≥ 4GB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.14 Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	34.8% Below average	Lighting 43.6 Reflection 49.8 Parallax 40.1 36% 44.5 fps	MRender 48 Gravity 39.6 Splatting 37.1 34% 41.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 45%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB 12,842 User benchmarks, average bench 166% 410GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXM7201Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 810 798 656 857 938 400 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	177% Outstanding	Read 1,215 Write 1,002 Mixed 1,040 SusWrite 743 224% 1,000 MB/s	4K Read 41.3 4K Write 80.8 4K Mixed 53.6 174% 58.6 MB/s	DQ Read 791 DQ Write 504 DQ Mixed 646 482% 647 MB/s
Poor: 104% ↑ This bench: 177% Great: 236%
Generic Externa 1TB 156 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 331GB free Firmware: 0056 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 108 94 113 109 112 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	55.6% Above average	Read 86.9 Write 100 Mixed 84.6 SusWrite 106 70% 94.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.5 175% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GB 19,438 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 12.1 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 9.4 30% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 87.1 46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	53	27	144	15.5"	1280 720	CMN1521

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IHRB_FA506IHRB Builds (Compare 148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IHRB_FA506IHRB

CPU
Ryzen 5 4600HAMDBench 70%, 27,218 samples	148x

GPU
RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)AMDBench 13%, 162,082 samples	105x
GeForce GTX 1650NvidiaBench 39%, 8,686 samples	43x

SSD
MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GBSamsungBench 166%, 12,842 samples	131x
MZVLQ1T0HBLB-00B00 1TBSamsungBench 205%, 7,795 samples	9x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	2x

RAM
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 19,438 samples	64x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 1x8GBMicronBench 42%, 8,707 samples	28x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 2x8GBMicronBench 83%, 15,291 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16