Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E546

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK E546  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB291
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170626
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateJan 12 '24 at 21:00
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Memory 33.4
1-Core 68.1
2-Core 123
40% 74.8 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 177
23% 174 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Fujitsu(10CF 18D1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4639
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
4.46% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 4.8
4% 4.1 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 5
Splatting 8
5% 5.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.46%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8 256GB
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: K8FA4102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 192 176 181 187 189 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 302
Write 224
Mixed 176
SusWrite 182
49% 221 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 28.4
4K Mixed 16
53% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 317
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 161
144% 222 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
25.7% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 8
25% 8.63 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 8.4
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 3: 0P 0R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
3% 4% 26 60 40 60 13.9" 1366 768 CMN14C3
Typical LIFEBOOK E546 Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E546

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback