Gigabyte GA-F2A85X-UP4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics59% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A85X-UP4  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20130313
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '24 at 19:49
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 45%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 93.8
1-Core 73.5
2-Core 139
64% 102 Pts
4-Core 175
8-Core 176
23% 175 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 2102 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59% Above average
Lighting 72.4
Reflection 76.1
Parallax 70.1
59% 72.9 fps
MRender 71.2
Gravity 74.6
Splatting 71
59% 72.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor Z1 SSD 240GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STKSF012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 155 151 151 156 156 MB/s
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.5% Above average
Read 279
Write 178
Mixed 201
SusWrite 175
47% 208 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 25.6
99% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 178
125% 154 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 86%
GS512 512GB
93GB free
Firmware: U0104A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 325 339 375 375 384 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 396
Write 321
Mixed 348
SusWrite 351
80% 354 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 68.8
4K Mixed 24
114% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 46.6
80% 154 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 95%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
216GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 110 114 116 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 108
Write 106
Mixed 66.9
SusWrite 111
72% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.2
222% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 109%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA630 1TB
372GB free
Firmware: JP4OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 80 80 80 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 72.8
Write 87.4
Mixed 40.6
SusWrite 79.3
51% 70 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 76%
WD WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB
356GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 44 48 45 49 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 61
Write 63.4
Mixed 38.6
SusWrite 44.5
38% 51.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMY8GX3M2A213 CMY8GX3M2B213 CMY8GX3M2A213 CMY8GX3M2B213 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
47% Average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 14.8
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 58.4
68% 58.4 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 47%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 72.3" 1280 720 SNYEE01 SONY TV
Typical GA-F2A85X-UP4 Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A85X-UP4 - $75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $313
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $64
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback