QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	19.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20231107
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '24 at 19:10
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	53%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 35 User benchmarks, average bench 44% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	32.4% Below average	Memory 42.5 1-Core 50.3 2-Core 92.8 36% 61.9 Pts	4-Core 122 8-Core 172 18% 147 Pts	64-Core 186 12% 186 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3746) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.33 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.4% Poor	Lighting 32.8 Reflection 31.1 Parallax 37.7 27% 33.9 fps	MRender 34.9 Gravity 35.9 Splatting 26.2 26% 32.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 52GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 8.1 1.6 92 32 1.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	19.1% Very poor	Read 338 Write 273 Mixed 282 SusWrite 34.2 52% 232 MB/s	4K Read 7.2 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 0 13% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 56%
Qemu HARDDISK 275GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 233GB free Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 0.8 0.2 6.8 2.9 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	37.8% Below average	Read 127 Write 45 Mixed 116 SusWrite 3 55% 72.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 3.2 545% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x16GB 3,887 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 1 of 1 slots used 16GB DIMM RAM Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	34.8% Below average	MC Read 18.5 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 11 40% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 4 13% 4.6 GB/s	Latency 205 20% 205 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 161%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	36	11	60	21.5"	1280 720	SAM0C18 S22E390

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	37x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	29x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	28x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 91%, 3,887 samples	139x
1x8GBQEMUBench 78%, 5,342 samples	73x
1x12GBQEMUBench 78%, 4,175 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16