Fujitsu CELSIUS_W550power

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	34.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS_W550power (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3417-A2
Memory	25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210929
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '24 at 17:45
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5 2,081 User benchmarks, average bench 76% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	Memory 83.1 1-Core 105 2-Core 196 74% 128 Pts	4-Core 360 8-Core 562 57% 461 Pts	64-Core 571 35% 571 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000 13,958 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Nvidia(10DE 11B3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1721 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 537.99 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	34.7% Below average	Lighting 49.7 Reflection 53.8 Parallax 54.9 40% 52.8 fps	MRender 49 Gravity 49.4 Splatting 0.3 24% 32.9 fps
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 42%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GB 6,868 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0MA001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 142 198 241 246 143 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	65.7% Good	Read 405 Write 298 Mixed 350 SusWrite 186 69% 310 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 44.8 4K Mixed 28.3 87% 30.4 MB/s	DQ Read 234 DQ Write 240 DQ Mixed 303 210% 259 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 94%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 108GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 142 140 141 141 141 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	Read 432 Write 397 Mixed 342 SusWrite 167 75% 335 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 54.9 4K Mixed 35.3 120% 40.1 MB/s	DQ Read 368 DQ Write 301 DQ Mixed 172 173% 280 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 108%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB 19,716 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 186GB free Firmware: 05.04C05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	25.1% Poor	Read 51 Write 36.5 Mixed 31.9 SusWrite 36.6 29% 39 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.5 93% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 49%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$137 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2.5TB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 152 149 149 150 151 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	90.1% Outstanding	Read 163 Write 170 Mixed 67.9 SusWrite 149 100% 138 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.2 457% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GU7AFR8N-UH 4x8GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.3% Very good	MC Read 25.7 MC Write 27.8 MC Mixed 22.6 72% 25.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 28 SC Mixed 21.1 61% 21.4 GB/s	Latency 76.8 52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 2: 0P 0R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
2%	13%	15	213	57	60	19"	1296 1024	NEC680E EA192M

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS_W550power Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 35%

Sail boat

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS_W550power

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	27x
Xeon E3-1275 v5IntelBench 78%, 368 samples	9x
Xeon E3-1245 v5IntelBench 76%, 2,081 samples	8x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	14x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	4x

SSD
MZ7LN512HMJP-00000 512GBSamsungBench 106%, 425 samples	9x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK512TBN 512GBBench 84%, 2,512 samples	4x
SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 256GBSamsung $223Bench 175%, 7,621 samples	3x

RAM
M378A1G43EB1-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 3,609 samples	8x
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 73%, 22,760 samples	6x
M378A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 8,407 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $380

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16