Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FA_X509FA

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FA_X509FA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509FA
Memory	1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210924
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '24 at 14:46
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	59%

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8145U 15,431 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	Memory 50.8 1-Core 53 2-Core 111 42% 71.5 Pts	4-Core 137 8-Core 125 18% 131 Pts	64-Core 126 8% 126 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 178,291 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1961) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	2.59% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 2.2 Parallax 5.8 1% 3.23 fps	MRender 4.5 Gravity 4.8 Splatting 7.9 5% 5.73 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.59% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3256GJ 256GB 2,813 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 103 69 68 85 78 MB/s Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.6% Average	Read 226 Write 139 Mixed 217 SusWrite 105 38% 172 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 28.9 4K Mixed 14.3 52% 18.5 MB/s	DQ Read 207 DQ Write 199 DQ Mixed 133 119% 180 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 1x4GB 1,799 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	22.5% Poor	MC Read 9 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 7 22% 7.77 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 7.3 20% 6.87 GB/s	Latency 169 24% 169 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 22.5% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 5: 0P 0R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
5%	13%	23	22	10	60	15.5"	1536 793	AUO61ED

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FA_X509FA Builds (Compare 246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FA_X509FA

CPU
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	110x
Core i3-8145UIntelBench 53%, 15,431 samples	94x
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	38x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	242x
UHD Graphics 610IntelBench 2%, 3,878 samples	4x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	35x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1202 512GBWDCBench 155%, 2,132 samples	33x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	15x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBMicronBench 57%, 2,923 samples	44x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 1x4GBMicronBench 33%, 1,799 samples	37x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16